Camping ordinance MC-1677

Opposed the camping ordinance, arguing it criminalizes poverty and doubles punishment instead of directing resources toward housing.

The ACLU SoCal policy analyst opposed the camping ordinance, calling it criminalization of poverty and urging the city to redirect resources to housing and services.

Strongly opposed, saying the ordinance criminalizes poverty while providing no housing resources.

A formerly homeless veteran opposed the ordinance, describing barriers to housing and services for disabled people and veterans.

Ward 2 resident opposed the amendment, urging realistic alternatives like safe parking, restrooms, and trash access for unhoused residents.

Ward 1 candidate and parks commissioner urged updating the code but said enforcement must come with mental health treatment, Navigation Center beds, and street lighting — not just moving people two blocks.

A formerly unhoused community organizer of 3.5 years opposed the ordinance, asking the council not to criminalize neighbors and to include unhoused people in solutions.

Speaking for the ACLU of Southern California, opposed the ordinance as double criminalization, noting all 1,046 shelter beds are full.

Opposed, urging the council to prioritize beds, bathrooms, and housing before enforcement.

Urged the council to address root causes and infrastructure instead of pushing unhoused people out of sight.